Forum

Policies – please read!

  • Everyone can read posts, but to start a new topic or add a reply you’d need to register. To create an ID, please verify your email address. You will get a link at that email address and you can then pick a password.
  • Be courteous to others. Treat others like you like to be treated. Discuss the issues. No ad-hominem attacks!
  • It’s OK to include external links if they are relevant. But please avoid spamming! Please no affiliate links.
  • Before starting a new topic, please check if that question/topic has been discussed before already and add to that discussion instead of starting a new topic.
  • If you’ve written a cool blog post that you want to share with others please post this in the “Self-Promo” category only!
  • Please read the usual Disclaimers and the Privacy Policy!
  • The forum policies may be amended in the future!
Notifications
Clear all

Glide Path Starting Point Mix


Adventuresinfire
Posts: 3
Topic starter
(@adventuresinfire)
New Member
Joined: 10 months ago

Huge ERN fan! My first time posting here. I’ve been working my way through all of the posts (and data!) and have a question on how to implement a guide path mix in practice.

Unless I’m missing something, my takeaway is if we’re comfortable in 100% equity ultimately but are most concerned (as it sounds like we should be) with sequence of returns risk, a 80–>100 or 60–>100 glide path would be the best option, especially if we’re looking to retire in a high stock valuation time period.

My question is around how to get to the starting place. Is the idea that we’re saving into the starting mix (eg 80/20) along the accumulation phase? Or rebalancing into it from 100% equity when ready to start glide path? Feels like the trade off would be tax implications at rebalancing versus return upside in accumulation phase.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts!

5 Replies
earlyretirementnow.com
Posts: 250
(@earlyretirementnowcom)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Good question. I haven't written about the GP toward retirement yet. Hopefully, next week I'll have a post addressing that issue! 🙂

Also, rebalancing should likely be done in the tax-efficient accounts. That's something everyone has to plan for individually! If you have no tax-efficient accounts at all, you definitely have to start a GP toward 80/20 through new cash flows into bonds during the last few years before retirement so as to avoid generating large equity capital gains!

Reply
1 Reply
Adventuresinfire
(@adventuresinfire)
Joined: 10 months ago

New Member
Posts: 3

@earlyretirementnowcom thanks, that’s helpful. So, seems like ideal is to try to get to a place where we can support the needed fixed income portion all in tax-efficient accounts and flip the switch when ready to retire from 100% equities during accumulation to 80/20 (for example), and then start GP back to 100% equities. Looking forward to upcoming GP article clearly!!

Reply
figuy1
Posts: 42
(@figuy1)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago

If most of your assets are in taxable accounts, one strategy could be to get at or close to your target amount of equities then save bonds for your last "bucket" to save and you wouldn't have to do many tax triggering transactions. Just don't reinvest dividends and use those to get to your target glide path.  Say if your target was 800k equities/200k bonds, and you're 3 years out with 800k in 100% equities just buy $67k in bonds per year with new contributions + un-reinvested dividends.

If you have a mortgage though you might want to pay it off before or while you transition to bonds if it has a higher interest rate than bonds will pay.

Looking forward to ERN's post on timing strategies on when to start the bond tent!

Reply
2 Replies
nobatmanjokes
(@nobatmanjokes)
Joined: 1 year ago

Trusted Member
Posts: 91

@figuy1 this is exactly my plan to glide out someday. Depending on rates at the time it also could be worth refinancing into a 5/1 ARM knowing that I’d be paying it off fully. Probably not worth it in the current rate environment but could be in the future!

Reply
Adventuresinfire
(@adventuresinfire)
Joined: 10 months ago

New Member
Posts: 3

@figuy1 Thanks, helpful additional context on building toward desired mix. Also, the mortgage point is interesting.

Reply
Share: