Policies – please read!
- Everyone can read posts, but to start a new topic or add a reply you’d need to register. To create an ID, please verify your email address. You will get a link at that email address and you can then pick a password.
- Be courteous to others. Treat others like you like to be treated. Discuss the issues. No ad-hominem attacks!
- It’s OK to include external links if they are relevant. But please avoid spamming! Please no affiliate links.
- Before starting a new topic, please check if that question/topic has been discussed before already and add to that discussion instead of starting a new topic.
- If you’ve written a cool blog post that you want to share with others please post this in the “Self-Promo” category only!
- The forum policies may be amended in the future!
What fixed yield equals instant retirement on 4% WR or 5% WR?
In April 2020, one could have bought preferred stock funds like PFF and PGF with a yield of 7.5%. The funds recovered their value from the shock extremely quickly, and reverted back to yielding 4-5%. Still, I suspect a person with a few hundred thousand bucks available could probably have made a retire-for-life move at that moment.
We could see such times again, so I wanted to use the SWR spreadsheet to answer the question: At what fixed income rate could an opportunist retire on what SWR? I wanted the spreadsheet to factor in inflation rates in particular.
I entered a fixed yield (e.g. 4% or 6%, divided by 12) in each cell of the Custom Series1 column and set the AA to 100% Custom Series1. The spreadsheet returned the a safe consumption rate basically equal to the yield I entered. All this makes me think I'm committing some sort of spreadsheet malpractice, because that's not accounting for inflation. Any suggestions?
See ERN's post on the yield illusion, high yield =/= safety.
Everything except for treasury bonds recovered well since April 2020. Despite the current bear market in equities, the S&P 500 is still up ~65% since April 2020, while PFF is only up ~18% since April '20 including dividend reinvestment. I don't think anyone could argue that they'd rather have preferred shares for the past two years over S&P 500 in retirement.
Preferred shares give the illusion of safe returns. But they are not. Inflation will take a bite out of them. Their $25 notional nominal value will be eroded through inflation. And the often fixed rate will be useless if you have an inflation shock like 2021 and 2022.
That said, you could check out some floating-rate shares. At least they will hedge against interest rate hikes. But then again, if the base rate goes up too slowly (right now, the LIBOR is still below 2%!) you will still lose some value due to inflation. Long-term, though, a floater should offer some protection.
To answer the question in the headline, if you could guarantee a fixed rate of return of only about 1.31% (real, CPI-adjusted) you can generate a 4% SWR with asset depletion: In excel:
To get 5% you need a 3.08% real fixed rate.
Back in the old days (late 1990s), when TIPS had real yields above 3% this was a retirement paradise!
That's interesting because PGF has a yield today of 5.32%, and the 10 year breakeven inflation rate is 2.74%.
IF inflation came in at that rate for the next 10 years, and IF PGF continued paying that same dividend, you'd have a (5.32-2.74=) 2.58% real return. Those are big ifs of course.
I agree that preferreds involve significant danger, and are not to be confused with bonds! They also tend to go on deep clearance sales at the bottom of bear markets like 2020 and 2008-9. I cite them because they make a good proxy for this question. But yes, any invetment with a fixed payout and no pricing power over its revenue is toast at the moment.
Funny thing about the late 90's retirement paradise: Everyone was chasing dot-com stocks instead of capitalizing on the FIRE opportunities right under their nose. I think we'll soon have opportunities right under our nose here in the 20's.