Forum

Update (12/31/2022):

It seems that new users have trouble registering for the forum. The confirmation email never shows up. I’ve decided to phase out this forum and transition over to a new forum plugin. The new location is here:

https://earlyretirementnow.com/forum-3/

Policies – please read!

  • Everyone can read posts, but to start a new topic or add a reply you’d need to register. To create an ID, please verify your email address. You will get a link at that email address and you can then pick a password.
  • Be courteous to others. Treat others like you like to be treated. Discuss the issues. No ad-hominem attacks!
  • It’s OK to include external links if they are relevant. But please avoid spamming! Please no affiliate links.
  • Before starting a new topic, please check if that question/topic has been discussed before already and add to that discussion instead of starting a new topic.
  • If you’ve written a cool blog post that you want to share with others please post this in the “Self-Promo” category only!
  • Please read the usual Disclaimers and the Privacy Policy!
  • The forum policies may be amended in the future!
andyg42
@andyg42
Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 6, 2022
Last seen: Aug 30, 2025
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Hey, I just “saved” the 4% Rule for 60 year Retirements* (ratchets, guardrails, variable equity allocation)

Simple 10MMA for variable equity allocation For those interested, attached is a version of the hacked spreadsheet using Meb Faber’s simple 10 Mo...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Hey, I just “saved” the 4% Rule for 60 year Retirements* (ratchets, guardrails, variable equity allocation)

Is Variable Equity Allocation “Ok”? I was all set to write something longer about why doing market timing in the context of SWRs is “ok”, when I...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Hey, I just “saved” the 4% Rule for 60 year Retirements* (ratchets, guardrails, variable equity allocation)

Ok, attached is some results for 4% and 4.5% WRs using the hacked sheet attached above on the dozen or so worst retirement cohorts. For each tab, to...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Hey, I just “saved” the 4% Rule for 60 year Retirements* (ratchets, guardrails, variable equity allocation)

@earlyretirementnowcom For a 75-0-25 stocks-bonds-gold initial allocation with the variable equity allocation as described above For 4.0% initial WR...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Hey, I just “saved” the 4% Rule for 60 year Retirements* (ratchets, guardrails, variable equity allocation)

Ok, time to "show my work". Hacked spreadsheet attached, .xlsx format I cloned the Case Study tab - see the tab called AG-Case-Study The var...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Hey, I just “saved” the 4% Rule for 60 year Retirements* (ratchets, guardrails, variable equity allocation)

Why Gold Not Bonds Why am I using gold rather than bonds for the non-equity portion of the portfolio? Here are 5 reasons: Bonds as a hed...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Algorithmic Glide Paths or AA Changes

@chris-b after staring at the different worst case scenarios for a while, here's what i did to combat the problem you found: 1) go from normal/aggre...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Algorithmic Glide Paths or AA Changes

@chris-b I've hacked the SWR sheet, the "Case Study" tab that has the glidepath for a given cohort retirement month in particular, to do something ver...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Evaluating our FIRE Possibility with a Well-Defined Post-Retirement Withdrawal Plan

@stocksalt9934, my comments for you mostly relate to the planned glidepath. first, unless I’ve missed something, the glidepath approach ERN outl...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Safely Rachet Real Spending

I should have added that this idea works in the context of targeting a Final Value (FV) of at least 50%. If targeting less than that, then obviously y...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Safely Rachet Real Spending

@hubcity, a couple of points. Yes, by definition if you are using a fail safe WR% and your real portfolio has increased, you can “safely” retire aga...

5 years ago
Page 2 / 2