Five Fishy Finance Phrases Deserving Diabolical Deaths

Halloween is around the corner, as evidenced by the annual return of the “Pumpkin Spice Latte” at Starbucks and 5-pound bags of sweet stuff at the grocery store! That’s also a good time to stab through the heart and kill with a silver bullet all those scary senseless finance myths, truisms, and falsehoods. Every time I hear one of the phrases below I suffer a mini heart attack. I hope people would stop saying those.

1: “Cash on the Sidelines”

If there is a lot of cash on the sidelines, the theory goes, it’s money waiting to be deployed into the market, sending stock prices skyward. That’s a common theme you hear from the talking heads on TV. But it’s nonsense. It reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how financial markets work. For every dollar a buyer deploys into the stock market, a seller has to take money out of the market. And that money will end up, you guessed it, on the sidelines.

The total stock market valuation does not go up because money flows into it (small exception: IPOs). Instead, folks who were previously not invested revise their valuation assumptions upward and now have to entice an existing stock owner to sell. The only way to do that is to offer a higher price. Thus, money previously sitting on the sidelines flowing into the market is not the cause for the market to go up, but a symptom. But it could also be a symptom of a falling market when existing owners ask for lower prices to entice the folks with money on the sidelines to buy.

Amazingly, even in the world of sports, this sideline analogy is somewhat asinine. For every player you bring in from the sideline, one of the current field players has to leave. You can never adjust the quantity of field player, you can only replace one player with another. If a diabolical death sounds too cruel it’s time we at least “sideline” this senseless phrase.

fumble-1581211_1280
If all those players standing on the sideline came into the game we’d win. Oh, wait, that’s not how it works!

2: “Market Timing”

If index returns are not enough and active management is too costly, what is one to do? Market timing! Simply buy low and sell high. Geez, why didn’t I think of that before? Market timing is easy in hindsight but in real time it’s very hard for professional investors and retail investors alike. If the China devaluation last year had sunk the global economy it would have been very smart had you sold in late August. But that didn’t happen. Everybody who tried to time the market and sold at the bottom regretted that decision.

Timing the stock market is poison for us in the FIRE community. Especially in the accumulation phase, I have greatly benefited from not losing my nerves during the major market drops and rather pumping new money into the stock market while everybody else was selling. I would leave market timing to the experts (who, by the way, also get it wrong about half the time!) and just roll with the punches in the stock market. Read Burton Malkiel’s book if you don’t believe me!

3: “You need an Emergency Fund”

Most of us in the FIRE community strive to save 25 years (years!) of expenses or more. That’s 300+ months of expenses, so we don’t believe that there is a need keep 3, 6, or even 8 months in cash/money market at essentially zero interest rate. We don’t want to repeat ourselves and simply refer to our previous posts:

Our emergency fund is exactly $0.00

Why an emergency fund is a bad idea in one single chart

Top 10 reasons for having an emergency fund – debunked (Part 1)

Top 10 reasons for having an emergency fund – debunked (Part 2)

4: “Buy the biggest home you can afford”

These are quite possibly the seven most dangerous words in personal finance. And, of course, the related “I will use my house to retire.” If you had done this around 2003 and were smart enough to sell your house in 2007, good for you. That rule might have worked as planned because the house probably appreciated much faster than the carrying cost of a large house. But that kind of calculation doesn’t normally work. That fancy bathroom or kitchen? It will look only so-so after five years, slightly outdated after 10 years and embarrassingly outdated after 20 years. So, be prepared to apply a 5% depreciation rate to the major components of the structure. And don’t forget to heat, cool and clean the place. It will be hard for the average expected home price appreciation to keep up with that cost.

5: “It’s a bubble”

We had the dot-com bubble in the early 2000s, the housing bubble in 2008/9. Now we have a new real estate bubble, a new equity bubble, a bond bubble, a credit bubble, a private equity bubble, and whatever the bubble of the week might be, according to the talking heads on TV and some bloggers on the web. Every time an asset class becomes more expensive than the historical norm, journalists and analysts are quick to use the B word. The only current bubble I see is the rampant overuse of the word “bubble” itself. True, equities and bonds are expensive but a bubble looks different. What distinguishes a bubble from a simply expensive market is that in the latter there are still potential and possible paths of outcomes that justify today’s valuations, while in the former there aren’t.

The path that justifies today’s valuations? If the central banks across the world return to normalcy along a very, very gradual path without sinking the economy, a continued oil price recovery, business investment bounces back, millennials move out of their parents’ basements and form households, inflation stays calm, etc. In that case, today’s valuations are fine. You may disagree with how likely this scenario may be, but at least there is a scenario with a probability greater than zero. Hence, today we’re likely not in a bubble. Tulips in Holland in the 1600s and pets.com in 2001 were certainly bubbles because there were no fathomable circumstances justifying prevailing valuations and it was just a question of time for the imbalance to collapse. But those occasions are extremely rare.

Honorable mention: “a 15-year mortgage saves you thousands of dollars on interest”

True, you save on interest. But our friend FinanciaLibre recently crunched the numbers and found that it’s only true when you ignore the opportunity cost of investing in higher yielding assets. Once you factor in the opportunity cost, you come out ahead with the 30-year mortgage and investing the differential cash flow in the stock market, even if the 15-year mortgage has a lower interest rate.

Honorable mention 2: “the company missed the earnings estimate”

This  was pointed out by Andrew at Par Compounded in the comments section below. Love it. That phrase is totally nonsensical. It’s the other way around: the forecasters got it wrong. As Andrew put it, it’s like saying that the weather missed the weather forecast.

What are your favorite peeves? In Finance and otherwise? Have a Scary and Happy Halloween!

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Five Fishy Finance Phrases Deserving Diabolical Deaths

  1. Ha, just reading “A Random Walk Down Wall St” right now and learned about the tulip story. Fascinating stuff.

    Peeves of Mr. PIE:

    1. This is an excellent growth opportunity….
    Translated as we are throwing you in the deep end and checking out your swimming abilities. Oh, and there are no lifesavers, just so you know….

    2. You gotta give 110%….
    Eh, not possible from my understanding of physics, maths

    3. It’s not rocket science….
    Like everyone says in the conversation about financial independence, yet we spend endless hours reading about it and learning how to get there. Could have learned rocket science in a smaller amount of time.

    4. You are empowered…
    Here is a little piece of work to spend some time on. Report back please with your findings, and when you do, know that I am still very much in charge.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for killing these myths! Someone had to do it…nicely done.

    I like the E-Fund one, that’s a good way to look at it. When you are already trying save 25x expenses to retire, does an E-Fund really make sense…nah.

    I’ve heard that before too on buying a big home… “oh its ok to stretch for a home, your payments will remain fixed while your salary will increase in the future so while you may be house poor today it’ll get better.” Yeah ok, and there goes saving for retirement in the meantime and I’m sure you won’t find new ways to spend future pay raises anyway.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Thanks for the shout, ERN! Muchas gracias!

    I’ve got tons of cash dolares sitting on the sidelines right now like big, angry linebackers waiting for these various bubbles to pop so I can sub them in and time the market perfectly (trust me; I can do this every single time; I look at charts that are never wrong) and buy the biggest house I can find and finance it with a 15-year mortgage (or maybe a 10-year mortgage!) and put the balance into an emergency fund. It’s gonna be rad. ‘Cuz I’m worth it.

    Great stuff, ERN – thanks again!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Ha! Good ones. I get tired of hearing those as well. Here’s mine: “Buy and hold is the best strategy”. Followed by “Buy and hold doesn’t work”.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Haha, that’s a good one. I recently heard some talking head on TV forecasting the recession probability as 15% over the next year. Really? Without knowing anything I would have picked a 1/6 chance for the exact same reason you mentioned. Thanks for stopping by!
      Cheers!

      Like

  5. I like the “buy the biggest home you can afford” myth debunked. I remember talking to my friend in middle school and he said that “I just want a big house.” His wanting a big house made me want a big house in return. Oh how times have changed. I live in a 500sq ft studio apartment and I still think I have too much space left over. It would be a different story if I had a roommate (I did go through a 500 sq ft apartment with a roommate and it wasn’t fun) but for just myself, I don’t want a big dwelling!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Haha! Love this list, especially #3! So many people that we talk to about our strategy to paying off student loan debt and dream to retire early just about die when we tell them we don’t have an “emergency fund.” Sorry that I don’t hate money enough to keep it from building interest for me (or more accurately, paying off interest for me). 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  7. ERN,

    Love this discussion!

    I think my all time favorite is “earnings missed estimates”

    That’s like saying the weather missed the weatherman’s forecast haha!

    The more accurate statement would be something like analysts forecasted incorrectly because the models were wrong haha!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Haha, that is a priceless comment. I never thought about it that way. Probably it’s because I work in finance that I succumbed to this delusion: blame the company for the bad forecasts. Only in finance can you get away with this.
      Thanks for pointing that out.
      Cheers!!!
      ERN

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s