Update (12/31/2022):
It seems that new users have trouble registering for the forum. The confirmation email never shows up. I’ve decided to phase out this forum and transition over to a new forum plugin. The new location is here:
https://earlyretirementnow.com/forum-3/
Policies – please read!
- Everyone can read posts, but to start a new topic or add a reply you’d need to register. To create an ID, please verify your email address. You will get a link at that email address and you can then pick a password.
- Be courteous to others. Treat others like you like to be treated. Discuss the issues. No ad-hominem attacks!
- It’s OK to include external links if they are relevant. But please avoid spamming! Please no affiliate links.
- Before starting a new topic, please check if that question/topic has been discussed before already and add to that discussion instead of starting a new topic.
- If you’ve written a cool blog post that you want to share with others please post this in the “Self-Promo” category only!
- Please read the usual Disclaimers and the Privacy Policy!
- The forum policies may be amended in the future!
- 34 - me, 36 - my wife. We’re both working full time currently, and she’s planning to for at least five more years. No kids, or plans to have them. USA.
- Investment Portfolio -
- $1,108,000
- $719,000 in taxable accounts
- $232,000 of which is company stock currently worth this amount after LTCG taxes
- $271,000 in 401k/403b
- $159,000 in Roth IRAs
- Allocation of roughly 80% stocks (company stock included), 20% cash/bonds
- Real estate -
- ~$625,000 main property, $240,000 mortgage
- ~$250,000 rental property, $97,000 mortgage
- Estimated annual expenses: $53,000, ~$4,500/month
Wow, thanks a lot for sharing. I looked at the Google Sheet and I found several small issues in your cash flow sheet:
1) You assume the HELOC cash flows are in the "real cash flow" column (column E in the sheet). But that should be in the nominal column.
2) I think that 2% rental appreciation above inflation is a bit aggressive.
3) minor issue: I get "=-FV(0.07/12,252,881.19,0,1)" = $506,074.27. Not sure what you used to calculate the FV of the HELOC after 21 years. Not a bit difference, though.
4) the 7% HELOC rate seems excessive. I'd use 4-5%.
But apart from that, the math looks OK. You will notice that the current failure rate of a $53k annual budget is around 10%. That would be not acceptable for me. But maybe you get better results with a lower HELOC rate and putting the HELOC cash flows into the nominal column. (currently, I can't edit this file)
Also: The problem with using the VPW, CAPE, etc. is that they are normally calibrated for a retirement problem without major supplemental flows. But with the initial work income, the HELOC, and the home sale, this doesn't really work very well!
Thank you as well for the excellent blog and outstanding work you've done in this space 🙂
1) You assume the HELOC cash flows are in the "real cash flow" column (column E in the sheet). But that should be in the nominal column.
My thinking here is that the HELOC draw would be adjusted for inflation as time goes by and not be a constant $881. I'm not sure if that would be reflected if it were moved to the nominal column.
2) I think that 2% rental appreciation above inflation is a bit aggressive.
That's fair. I was going back and forth on this number and was having trouble coming to a conclusion. A lot of the information I found on the local housing market was coming from realtors and property management companies that of course only talk about how great the market is. Looking at the historical trends, the market seems very strong, but I'm not sure how to evaluate it properly. Maybe it makes sense to think about this market as stock-like in volatility. More research to do here.
3) minor issue: I get "=-FV(0.07/12,252,881.19,0,1)" = $506,074.27. Not sure what you used to calculate the FV of the HELOC after 21 years. Not a bit difference, though.
Thank you for that formula 🙂 I was using the compound interest calculator here, but I'm not sure how they calculate it behind the scenes. I also selected a daily compounding frequency, as my understanding is that is how HELOCs operate.
4) the 7% HELOC rate seems excessive. I'd use 4-5%.
I arrived at this number because I was unsure what kind of terms I would be able to get a year from now and was hedging against an increase (I have a quote for 5% fixed-rate now.) I'm curious your thoughts on fixed vs variable rate HELOCs too. The rates today are attractive, but historically quite scary. I'm thinking that a fixed rate would be safest and best for our peace of mind.
You will notice that the current failure rate of a $53k annual budget is around 10%. That would be not acceptable for me.
Agreed, I would not be satisfied with that failure rate either. Fortunately, the $53k annual budget is what we spend today. After the mortgage is paid off when I retire, our budget will be reduced to $39k, which is below the "failsafe" budget of $45k. I don't appear to be able to edit my original post - I should have referenced this in my beginning number set.
The problem with using the VPW, CAPE, etc. is that they are normally calibrated for a retirement problem without major supplemental flows. But with the initial work income, the HELOC, and the home sale, this doesn't really work very well!
Yes, this definitely makes things stickier. I need to give some thought to how to best plan withdrawals given these supplemental flows. I'm thinking that the conservative nature of CAPE-based withdrawals (less the HELOC flow) will be a "safe" baseline, and actual "failsafe" withdrawal rates will be higher.
Another thought - I wonder if it would make sense in practice to make HELOC withdrawals similarly to bonds. Rather than making static withdrawals from the HELOC every month, instead base it off of market conditions. With a high CAPE, you theoretically want to realize more of your stock gains as the risk of a market downturn increases. When the market actually does turn down, you can withdraw a greater amount from the HELOC without having to sell as much of the stock portion.
There would be additional risk here if there is a market downturn early in retirement, and a large amount is withdrawn from the HELOC that can then compound for a longer time than it would have otherwise. Perhaps setting an upper limit on the amount you can withdraw being equal to the amount you would have withdrawn if you used a static withdrawal approach.
There are capital gain tax considerations to be made here too, but I think this could fit in nicely with an active equity glidepath strategy. 🙂
Sorry, missed this one.
If your HELOC is large enough, why not. But the problem with this strategy is that it may take a long time for equities to recover. And remember, the market has to recover not just to a level higher than when you made the withdrawal but the SPX has to also recover the HELOC interest. There have been recessions where that would have taken years, even decades.